24/7 Free DUI Help 413-731-9995


SJC to Review Pleas Conditioned to Preserve Defendant’s Right to Appeal

Posted by Erica M. Bruno | Feb 23, 2018 | 0 Comments

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court is scheduled to hear arguments regarding conditional pleas on April 2, 2018 in Commonwealth v. Gomez, SJC-12437. In the federal system and in many states, a defendant may condition his plea to preserve his right to appeal the denial of a  pretrial motion. This type of plea allows a defendant to quickly enter into a disposition, directly appeal the denial of his pretrial motion, and withdraw his plea to re-litigate his case if he is successful on appeal. Attorney Bernard currently has a case pending on appeal which has been stayed to await the decision in Gomez.

There are many benefits to these types of pleas, particularly judicial economy. Often times, a defendant will take his case to trial solely to preserve an issue for appeal. This type of plea would benefit the trial court system because it would allow a defendant to dispose of a case quickly and efficiently without forgoing his right to appeal the true issue of his case.

There is no case law in Massachusetts that precludes a defendant from entering into a conditional plea. Rule 12 of the Massachusetts Rules of Criminal Procedure, which addresses pleas, is also silent on this issue. However, there is one statute that speaks to the rehearing of a pretrial motion after a defendant has entered into a plea. G.L. c. 278, §18 states that “[a]ny pretrial motion filed in a criminal case… decided before entry of defendant's decision on waiver of the right to jury trial shall not be refiled or reheard thereafter, except in the discretion of the court as substantial justice requires.”

The statute does not, however, describe where such pretrial motion is to be reheard. Typically in the legal context, the term “rehear” indicates that the court that originally heard the pretrial motion will hear it again. Yet, the Massachusetts legislature has used the term to implicate the venue and jurisdiction of the appeals court. When the Massachusetts legislature established the appeals court in 1972 by statute, the acts stated that the court of appeals was created for the “rehearing of matters of law arising in civil and criminal cases… ” House Act No. 3553 (1972) (App. at 47); Senate Act No.1277 (1972) (App. at 49); see also Appeals Court History (App. at 63). The legislature has arguably again implicated the venue and jurisdiction of the appeals court in G.L. c. 278, §18.

Listen to the oral arguments on April 2nd: http://www.suffolk.edu/sjc/

About the Author

Erica M. Bruno

Erica M. Bruno is an associate attorney in the Law Offices of Joseph D. Bernard. She practices criminal law in district courts across the state.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Fight to protect your future

If found guilty, you may be facing serious penalties and life altering consequences, including jail time, steep fines, court ordered alcohol treatment programs, and community service. In addition, your driver’s license can be suspended for an extended period of time. Depending on the specific circumstances pertaining to your case, your offense may be charged as a felony, which exponentially increases your penalties. Do not sit back and wait for your charges to resolve themselves. Be proactive and call immediately to secure the representation of Attorney Joseph Bernard to resolve your case in the most efficient way possible and with the most favorable outcome available to you.


Springfield Office

1 Monarch Pl Suite 1100
Springfield, MA 01144